<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intraday Commentary ~ 1/5/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/</link>
	<description>A Resource For Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:15:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PaulvsPaulson</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21857</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulvsPaulson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21857</guid>
		<description>thanks again...

don&#039;t like these short etf&#039;s one bit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks again&#8230;</p>
<p>don&#8217;t like these short etf&#8217;s one bit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilCapitalist</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21856</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilCapitalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21856</guid>
		<description>This is not about TNA/TZA but it is about FAZ/FAS, close enough:

http://j2eewebprogrammer.blogspot.com/2008/12/investing-in-fazfas.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not about TNA/TZA but it is about FAZ/FAS, close enough:</p>
<p><a href="http://j2eewebprogrammer.blogspot.com/2008/12/investing-in-fazfas.html" rel="nofollow">http://j2eewebprogrammer.blogspot.com/2008/12/investing-in-fazfas.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulvsPaulson</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21853</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulvsPaulson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21853</guid>
		<description>thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmesdjian</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21852</link>
		<dc:creator>pmesdjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21852</guid>
		<description>NY ROUNDUP – Monday, January 5, 2009 

HIGHLIGHTS 

US auto sales drop 36% in 2008 – better than feared
US President Elect Obama: Expects “sobering” unemployment number
US November construction spending drop 0.6% - better than expected


COMMENTS 
The 2009 trading year has started with a notable confusion.  The bang of buying equities, selling bonds, selling USD and buying commodities reversed somewhat today – indicating that trees don’t always grow to the sky especially in a jungle.  The arguments for money being put to work January 2 and changing January 5th don’t mix well with too much cash and too much pessimism.  We remain in a jungle of correlations conundrums raining down on the risk appetites of the rational investor.  1) Equities did better than many expected today – as they managed to look at the real data releases and find some hope that construction spending wasn’t as bad as feared thanks to the non-residential growth.  4Q GDP may be better than the 6% feared and priced because of this report.  Throw in that auto sales were better than feared thanks to the discounting and down 36% y/y seems like a win.  Equities seem to be content in a massive sector rotation.  Not a shock that energy won out today with oil up 2% while utilities suffered as bonds cratered again.  The dispersion over volatility trade will be something that makes the jungle thick with trading confusion.  2) Bonds didn’t like supply.  The news that the US Treasury intends to sell $30 bn in 3Y and reopen a 10Y for $16 bn led to another 20 bps pain trade in the 30Y.  The move in rates is the biggest in 15 years.  Supply of $2 trillion this year before the real spending of the Obama $800 bn stimulus spooks many to think about rates requiring a premium.  Throw in the Barron’s article and you get a market that believes in a bubble pop.  3) The real bubble is cash?  What seems clear to anyone chasing yields and returns in 2009 is that safe havens are confusing.  Look at 1M rates – sub 5 bps.  The opportunity cost of staying in cash isn’t yet high enough to convince the world to rush to other trades.  Deflation vs. efforts at reflation continue to hangover the USD.  The FX market voted for more deflation today – as the EUR gave back all its December gains breaking the key 1.3840 support and the 1.3620 100 day moving average.  We close below both and open up a test of 1.32-1.35 zone.  The demand for EUR into year end may be one of the funding stories of the 2008 credit crunch.  What happens in 2009 will be about confusing correlations with value.  The GS Research call today for trade number 8 – short EUR against a basket of NOK, SEK, GBP – made money today.  Even more was found in the short USD/CAD and long AUD positions – both of which have been tactically discussed by the GS team as well.  The mixture of EUR/CAD and EUR/AUD in describing a world concerned about value and reflation leaves commodity linked currencies in a special place so far in 2009.  Stay tuned as we have plenty of news yet to come this week with BOE, US employment and global Service PMIs - all likely to test the theory that we have already repriced a recovery before we know the depths of this great recession. 

CURRENCIES                     
Cross             Low        High 
EUR/USD          1.3546    1.3697        Close: 1.3604 
USD/JPY            92.85      93.58      Close: 93.17  
EUR/JPY          126.38     127.57      Close: 126.75 
GBP/USD         1.4475     1.4740        Close: 1.4725 
EUR/GBP         0.9231     0.9420        Close: 0.9239 
USD/CHF         1.1000     1.1117        Close: 1.1084 
EUR/CHF         1.4997     1.5087        Close: 1.5078 
AUD/USD         0.7062     0.7183        Close: 0.7151 
USD/CAD         1.1867     1.2179        Close: 1.1892 
NZD/USD          0.5808     0.5918       Close: 0.5897</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY ROUNDUP – Monday, January 5, 2009 </p>
<p>HIGHLIGHTS </p>
<p>US auto sales drop 36% in 2008 – better than feared<br />
US President Elect Obama: Expects “sobering” unemployment number<br />
US November construction spending drop 0.6% &#8211; better than expected</p>
<p>COMMENTS<br />
The 2009 trading year has started with a notable confusion.  The bang of buying equities, selling bonds, selling USD and buying commodities reversed somewhat today – indicating that trees don’t always grow to the sky especially in a jungle.  The arguments for money being put to work January 2 and changing January 5th don’t mix well with too much cash and too much pessimism.  We remain in a jungle of correlations conundrums raining down on the risk appetites of the rational investor.  1) Equities did better than many expected today – as they managed to look at the real data releases and find some hope that construction spending wasn’t as bad as feared thanks to the non-residential growth.  4Q GDP may be better than the 6% feared and priced because of this report.  Throw in that auto sales were better than feared thanks to the discounting and down 36% y/y seems like a win.  Equities seem to be content in a massive sector rotation.  Not a shock that energy won out today with oil up 2% while utilities suffered as bonds cratered again.  The dispersion over volatility trade will be something that makes the jungle thick with trading confusion.  2) Bonds didn’t like supply.  The news that the US Treasury intends to sell $30 bn in 3Y and reopen a 10Y for $16 bn led to another 20 bps pain trade in the 30Y.  The move in rates is the biggest in 15 years.  Supply of $2 trillion this year before the real spending of the Obama $800 bn stimulus spooks many to think about rates requiring a premium.  Throw in the Barron’s article and you get a market that believes in a bubble pop.  3) The real bubble is cash?  What seems clear to anyone chasing yields and returns in 2009 is that safe havens are confusing.  Look at 1M rates – sub 5 bps.  The opportunity cost of staying in cash isn’t yet high enough to convince the world to rush to other trades.  Deflation vs. efforts at reflation continue to hangover the USD.  The FX market voted for more deflation today – as the EUR gave back all its December gains breaking the key 1.3840 support and the 1.3620 100 day moving average.  We close below both and open up a test of 1.32-1.35 zone.  The demand for EUR into year end may be one of the funding stories of the 2008 credit crunch.  What happens in 2009 will be about confusing correlations with value.  The GS Research call today for trade number 8 – short EUR against a basket of NOK, SEK, GBP – made money today.  Even more was found in the short USD/CAD and long AUD positions – both of which have been tactically discussed by the GS team as well.  The mixture of EUR/CAD and EUR/AUD in describing a world concerned about value and reflation leaves commodity linked currencies in a special place so far in 2009.  Stay tuned as we have plenty of news yet to come this week with BOE, US employment and global Service PMIs &#8211; all likely to test the theory that we have already repriced a recovery before we know the depths of this great recession. </p>
<p>CURRENCIES<br />
Cross             Low        High<br />
EUR/USD          1.3546    1.3697        Close: 1.3604<br />
USD/JPY            92.85      93.58      Close: 93.17<br />
EUR/JPY          126.38     127.57      Close: 126.75<br />
GBP/USD         1.4475     1.4740        Close: 1.4725<br />
EUR/GBP         0.9231     0.9420        Close: 0.9239<br />
USD/CHF         1.1000     1.1117        Close: 1.1084<br />
EUR/CHF         1.4997     1.5087        Close: 1.5078<br />
AUD/USD         0.7062     0.7183        Close: 0.7151<br />
USD/CAD         1.1867     1.2179        Close: 1.1892<br />
NZD/USD          0.5808     0.5918       Close: 0.5897</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom (formally know as tom)</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21851</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom (formally know as tom)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21851</guid>
		<description>I seach for stocks that have less than .25 debt ratio, lower than 8 PE, over 1M shares traded each day, and under $5/share(can not be shorted under $5.00).  Then I research the best ones and time the buy at the crossovers.  That is my buy strategy for longer term stocks.  

Otherwise, I gamble with some hot leads!!!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seach for stocks that have less than .25 debt ratio, lower than 8 PE, over 1M shares traded each day, and under $5/share(can not be shorted under $5.00).  Then I research the best ones and time the buy at the crossovers.  That is my buy strategy for longer term stocks.  </p>
<p>Otherwise, I gamble with some hot leads!!!  <img src='http://www.stocktock.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mav</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21850</link>
		<dc:creator>mav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21850</guid>
		<description>why doesn&#039;t it have any business above $35?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why doesn&#8217;t it have any business above $35?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mav</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21849</link>
		<dc:creator>mav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21849</guid>
		<description>Hmm. better safe than sorry. Don&#039;t chase FCX here. I am expecting a &quot;deep&quot; pullback into the rest of the week (around 888 or so). Lets see how that goes. 

So no playing any sides yet. I just own TBT from 36. and long term SPY puts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. better safe than sorry. Don&#8217;t chase FCX here. I am expecting a &#8220;deep&#8221; pullback into the rest of the week (around 888 or so). Lets see how that goes. </p>
<p>So no playing any sides yet. I just own TBT from 36. and long term SPY puts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21848</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21848</guid>
		<description>FCX was my favorite stock during the last bull market. However, I have been too cautious recently to buy any individual company&#039;s stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCX was my favorite stock during the last bull market. However, I have been too cautious recently to buy any individual company&#8217;s stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unersaettlich</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21847</link>
		<dc:creator>Unersaettlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21847</guid>
		<description>The leverage is figured DAILY, so there is no basis to suppose that the bear ETF will have a longer-term cumulative move equal to the negative of its bull counterpart.  I have tested tons of data, and the DAILY leverage factor holds pretty well, but CUMULATIVE leverage is a different story.

Also, remember that it takes a 100% rise to recover a 50% drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leverage is figured DAILY, so there is no basis to suppose that the bear ETF will have a longer-term cumulative move equal to the negative of its bull counterpart.  I have tested tons of data, and the DAILY leverage factor holds pretty well, but CUMULATIVE leverage is a different story.</p>
<p>Also, remember that it takes a 100% rise to recover a 50% drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FLguy</title>
		<link>http://www.stocktock.com/2009/01/05/intraday-commentary-1509/comment-page-2/#comment-21846</link>
		<dc:creator>FLguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stocktock.com/?p=10744#comment-21846</guid>
		<description>IMO who actually wants to &quot;own&quot; equities now? Baby boomers feel they don&#039;t have enough time left to recoup their losses. Losta cash on the sidelines that&#039;s not going back in. The GenY&#039;s I know trade/swing ETF&#039;s. GenXers through their depleted and shrinking 401K&#039;s? I&#039;m 58 btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO who actually wants to &#8220;own&#8221; equities now? Baby boomers feel they don&#8217;t have enough time left to recoup their losses. Losta cash on the sidelines that&#8217;s not going back in. The GenY&#8217;s I know trade/swing ETF&#8217;s. GenXers through their depleted and shrinking 401K&#8217;s? I&#8217;m 58 btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
